vs : Our 5 Key Differences
Usability: 's is more minimal than 's. New users might find it difficult to use.
Scalability: is easier to scale than .
Popularity: Both tools have a loyal user base. However, has a bigger community.
: has no calendar . Users can't run tasks independently in .
Reviews: and reviews are generally positive. users ranked "ease of use" low.
Despite the pandemic situation slowing the market growth of data integration software, reliable data management tools are very much in high demand. Businesses need access to data from ever-more disparate systems and SaaS, and effective tools to help them achieve this. and are two options that offer via creation. Basically, both of these tools move data from point A to point B quickly. But which one is better? Welcome to our vs. explainer, exploring which is the best tool and what the differences are - and why Integrate.io could be a better option all around for data integration.
Table of Contents
vs. : Features and Benefits
vs. : Details
Before we compare features and benefits, let's take a closer look at these two tools. It might seem like and do the same thing in terms of , but they serve slightly different purposes:
is a created by travel accommodation experts , specifically for authoring, , and monitoring to various business sources. It runs using the programming language , became an Apache Incubator project in 2016, and a Top-Level Apache Software Foundation project in 2019. Because of this, it's now called .
Although and have slightly different functions, they share many features:
Both tools use .
Both use a single for a directed graph.
Both use standards.
Both allow users to define tasks, commands, and conditional paths of .
Both allow users to visualize .
Both are which means they’re freely available to developers.
For now, let's dive deeper into the differences between and .
vs. : Usability
. feature , on the other hand, has a central and custom calendar capabilities, providing users with lots of flexibility. This could be seen as a point in ’s favor. and both have pros and cons when it comes to usability. For example, there's no calendar in . The central tasks instead. However, users can run tasks independently whenever they like with the
New users might struggle with 's , which is much more minimal than its rival, making it less intuitive for new users. It's just much easier to view task logs, code runs, and other data in . Plus, it’s surprisingly easy to " " historical tasks. has all this information too, but you need to dig deeper to find it. Once you are familiar with the , however, you can create highly complex without breaking a sweat.
Next, let's talk about directed acyclical graphs (): lets users view multiple tasks before pipeline execution. doesn't. For companies that depend on to prevent bad data from entering their , this is an important difference. Essentially, in , you don't know what code is running in corresponding tasks until much later on in the process.
Struggling with coding your own pipelines? Integrate.io’s low-code environment makes it simple to create integrations to multiple business SaaS and other services.
vs. : Scalability
Because has the feature, users can separate tasks from crons, which makes everything easy to scale. , however, doesn't offer the same scalability benefits. This is because users have to split tasks into various sub-pipelines, which is a long and laborious process. There's no way to pipelines in either.
There are two main scalability issues in :
Tasks are so tightly coupled to that scalability is difficult.
The number of cron workers working on the job limits the number of worker processes.
These problems might not affect all businesses. However, many will find scalability in Talk to Integrate.io about an integration platform that scales up and down as you need it, effortlessly. a challenge.
vs. : Popularity
The most popular aren't always the best ones. However, popular tools tools have bigger communities, which can make it easier to access user-support features, including or repositories.
Both and have developed loyal user bases over the years and established themselves as reputable tools:
created in 2014.
created in 2012.
However, has a much larger community, and users have developed service-level agreements, trigger rules, and other perks. You won't find these in .
Many famous companies use these tools:
vs. : Pricing
The good news is that both and use , which means they are completely free. But there are some caveats.
tools like and are low-cost alternatives to commercial (or proprietary) tools. However, many of them have scalability and performance issues that won't suit some businesses. As we already mentioned, lacks the scalability capabilities many businesses require for . You might not notice its limitations until you start running multiple tasks and by this point, it could be too late.
Another example is the lack of calendar on . While this won’t affect all businesses, you might find this a hindrance to your efforts. Plus, on both and are rather limited.
In many cases, paying for an industry-leading like Integrate.io is well worth the investment. platform
vs. : Reviews
This section focuses on what users think of these two platforms and how well they work for business data integration.
4.3 out of 5 stars on the popular technology review website G2, based on 35 customer reviews (as of April 2022). has an average rating of
Nikita K., a says that : is engineer,
“A very handy tool for someone working in & ”
Most reviews are generally positive. However, some criticisms include:
Users need to know the programming language.
No drag-and-drop feature.
A lack of options.
A "buggy" .
One reviewer, a data analyst for a mid-market enterprise notes:
"One of the greatest challenge[s] is that the learning curve [can] be a little bit deep, and some of the functions…can be confusing…and once you have deployed the pipeline, it is difficult to make changes.”.
Unfortunately, there are no Predictive Analytics Today, which evaluates many different platforms. reviews on G2. However, we can compare with reviews on the website
has an average user rating of 7.9/10, a score which has fallen in the last two years, indicating that there are better, more comprehensive data integration platforms on the market, like Integrate.io.
" takes care of a lot of so that users can focus on tasks themselves and their ," says Predictive Analytics Today.
It's also worth noting:
users only scored "ease of use" a 6.7.
Users ranked “features and functionality” at only 7.3.
Consider your business data needs, and go with a feature-rich like Integrate.io that’s low code with a shallow learning curve and a wealth of resources at your fingertips. platform
vs vs Integrate.io
After comparing features, prices, and customer reviews, we think takes the edge over . However, both of these well-established tools are of use to and analysts with plenty of coding experience. Of course, there are limitations to both. Neither nor provides businesses with all the features they so often require, such as unlimited scalability and flexible .
Consider investing in an Integrate.io is a new data integration, , and ELT platform that gives you unparalleled insights into your . Quickly build to your data lake or cloud , such as Snowflake or a repository like , for a variety of , in an intuitive, low-code environment. Pre-built integrations allow you to create these with ease, while intelligent management ensures you have access to every one of your . allows for fast, change data capture (CDC) without constantly reloading historical data. solution that provides you with more.